A multidisciplinary Journal in the field of Agricultural Engineering

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems Department, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran Department of Agronomy, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran

2 Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems Department, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

10.22069/bere.2025.23066.1012

Abstract

Energy consumption is one of the main issues in production systems because of the role in production costs and environmental impacts. The present study was conducted to investigate the environmental aspect of mung bean farms in the 2022-2023 crop year. The required data were collected through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews with 78 mung bean farmers in Darehshahr, Ilam, Iran. Input-output materials were calculated and based on them material and energy indicators and carbon footprint were calculated. The results showed that the carbon footprint of mung bean production was 2.74 ton CO2 eq.ha-1 (2.42 kg CO2 eq.kg-1). The total amount of input and output energy in mung bean production was 12586.49 and 16604.40 MJ.ha-1, respectively. The most important energy-intensive inputs in mung bean production were nitrogen fertilizer, fuel, and electricity with the shares of 32.57, 25.88, and 24.43%, respectively. The values of energy efficiency, productivity, intensity, net gain, and net gain efficiency were 1.32, 0.09 kg/MJ, 11.11 MJ/kg, 4017.91 MJ/ha, and 0.32 MJ.MJ-1, respectively. Given the low share of renewable energy (3.49%), increasing renewable energy consumption is necessary in mung bean production.

Graphical Abstract

Investigating the energy consumption and carbon footprint in mung bean production ecosystems in Iran

Highlights

 Research Highlights:

  • Input-output materials of mung bean production were determined in 2022-2023 crop year.
  • The input and output energy was 12586.49 and 16604.40 ha-1, respectively.
  • The most energy contributors were nitrogen fertilizer (57), fuel (25.88%), and electricity (24.43).
  • The energy efficiency (32,), productivity (0.09 kg/MJ), and net gain efficiency (and 0.32 MJ.MJ-1) were calculated.
  • The carbon footprint of mung bean production was 2.74 ton CO2ha-1 (2.42 kg CO2 eq.kg-1).

Keywords

Abad-Gonzalez, J., Nadi, F., Perez-Neira, D. 2024. Energy-water-food security nexus in mung bean production in Iran: An LCA approach. Ecological Indicators, 158, 111442.
Beheshti Tabar, I., Keyhani, A.R. and Rafiee, S. 2010. Energy balance in Iran Agronomy. Renew. Energy. 14: 489- 855.
Camargo, G. G., Ryan, M. R., & Richard, T. L. (2013). Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool. BioScience, 63(4), 263-273.‏
Chauhan, N.S., Mohapatra, P.K.J, Pandey, K.P. (2006) Improving energy productivity in paddy production through benchmarking: an application of data envelopment analysis. Energy Convers Manag, 47, 1063-85.
De, D., Singh, R.S., Chandra, H. (2001) Technological impact on energy consumption in rainfed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Appl Energy, 70, 193-213.
Dekamin, M., Kheiralipour, K., Keshavarz Afshar, R., 2022. Energy, economic, and environmental assessment of coriander seed production using material flow cost accounting and life cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
Dekamin, M., Kheiralipour, K., 2023. Material and Energy Flow Cost Accounting (MEFCA) of Grape Production in Malayer City. Iranian Agricultural Economics Society. 37(3), 325-340.
Erdal, G., Esengu, K., Erdal, H., Gunduz, O. (2007) Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy, 32, 35-41.
Esengun, K., Erdal, G., Gündüz, O., & Erdal, H. (2007). An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey. Renewable Energy, 32(11), 1873-1881.‏
FAOSTAT (2023). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Database. Online:        https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
Fathi, A., Barari Tari, D., Fallah Amoli, H., & Niknejad, Y. (2020). Study of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in corn production systems: influence of different tillage systems and use of fertilizer. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(6), 769-778.‏
Gholamrezaee, H., Kamran Kheiralipour, K., Rafiee, S., 2021. Investigation of energy and environmental indicators in sugar production from sugar beet. Journal of Environmental Studies Sciences 6(2): 3540-3548.
Ghorbani, R., Mondani, F., Amirmoradi, S., Feizi, H., Khorramdel, S., Teimouri, M., ... & Aghel, H. (2011). A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems. Applied Energy, 88(1), 283-288.‏
Gilani, A., Abbasdokht, H., & Gholami, A. (2021). Nutritional effects of essential sulfur along with Halothiobacillus neapolitanus on morphophysiological and agronomic responses of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION, 31(4), 189-205.
Guinee, J.B. 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. NewYork: Kluwer Academic.
Heidari, M.D., Mobli, H., Omid, M., Rafiee, S., Jamali Marbini, V., Elshout, P.M.F., Van Zelm, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J. 2017. Spatial and technological variability in the carbon footprint of durum wheat production in Iran. Internation Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. DOI 10.1007/s11367-017-1283-1.
Hesampour, R., Hassani, M., Hanafiah, M.M., Heidarbeigi, K. 2022. Technical efficiency, sensitivity analysis and economic assessment applying data envelopment analysis approach: A case study of date production in Khuzestan State of Iran. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 21(3), 197-207.
Hunady, I., Hochman, M., 2014. Potential of legume-cereal intercropping for increasing yields and yield stability for self-sufficiency with animal fodder in organic farming. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 50, 185–194.
IPCC, 2006. IPCC 14040. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, editors. Prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. Japan: IGES.
ISO 14040, 2006; Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
Jalilian, M.M., Kheiralipour, K., Mirzaee Ghaleh, E. 2021. Comparison of environmental indicators in Sangak and Lavash bread production in Eslamabad-e-Gharb, Kermanshah. Journal of Environmental Sciences Studies 5(4), 3198-3203.
Jalilian, M.M., Kheriralipour, K., Mirzaee Ghaleh, E. 2020. Comparison of energy status in the production process of Lvash and Sangak bread. 12th National Iranian Congress on Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems and Mechanization. 3-5 February, Ahvaz, Iarn.
Kashyap, D., Agarwal, T. 2021. Carbon footprint and water footprint of rice and wheat production in Punjab, India. Agricultural Systems, 186,102959.
Kazemi, H., Shahbyki, M., Baghbani, S., 2015. Energy analysis for faba bean production: A case study in Golestan province. Iran. Sustainable Production and Consumption 3, 15-20.
Kheiralipour, K. (2022) Sustainable Production: Definitions, Aspects, and Elements. 1st Edition. Nova Science Publishers, New York, US.
Kheiralipour, K. 2021, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Poultry Production Systems. In: Jacob-Lopes, E., Zepka, L. Q., Depra, M. C. Interdisciplinary applications of the life cycle assessment tool. 1st Ed., Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.
Kheiralipour, K. 2020. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment. 1st Ed., Ilam University Publication. Ilam, Iran.
Kheiralipour, K., Brandao, M., Holka, M., Chorynski, A. 2024a. A review of environmental impacts of wheat production in different agrotechnical systems. Resources, 13(7), 93.
Kheiralipour, K., Gholamrezaee, G., Rafiee, S. (2018) Investigation of energy status in sugar production. 11th National Congress on Biosystems Engineering and Agricultural Mechanization, 3-5 September, Hamedan, Iran.
Kheiralipour, K., Jafari Samrin, H., Soleimani, M. 2017. Determining the environmental impacts of canola production by life cycle assessment, case study: Ardabil Province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 48(4), 517-526.
Kheiralipour, K., Payandeh, Z. Khoshnevisan, B. (2017). Evaluation of environmental impacts in turkey production system in Iran.  Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 7, 507-512.
Kheiralipour, K., Rafiee, S., Karimi, M., Nadimi, M., Paliwal, J. 2024b. The environmental impacts of commercial poultry production systems using life cycle assessment: a review, World's Poultry Science Journal. 80 (1), 33-54.
Kheiralipour, K., Sheikhi, N. (2021) Material and energy flow in different bread baking types. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 10512-10527.
Kheiralipour, K., Tashanifar, E., Hemati, A., Motaghed, S., Golmohammadi, A.R. 2022.  Environmental impact investigation of natural gas refinery process based on LCA CML-IA baseline method. Gas Processing Journal. 9(2): 1-14.
Khodaei joghan, A., taki, M., & matoorian, H. (2022). Evaluating energy productivity, greenhouse gas emission, global warming potential and sustainability index of Wheat and Rapeseed agroecosystems in Khorramshahr. Jounal of Agricultural Sciecne and Sustainable Production, 32(1), 309-324.
Kitani, O. (1999) Energy and biomass engineering, CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering. ASAE Publications, St Joseph, MI.
Kramer KJ, Moll HC, Nonhebel S. 1999. Total greenhouse gas emissions related to the Dutch crop production system. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 72:9–16.
Li, T., Baležentis, T., Makutėnienė, D., Streimikiene, D., & Kriščiukaitienė, I. (2016). Energy-related CO2 emission in European Union agriculture: Driving forces and possibilities for reduction. Applied Energy, 180, 682-694.‏
Mohammadi, A., & Omid, M. (2010). Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87(1), 191-196.‏
Mohammadzadeh, A., Mahdavi Damghani, A., Vafabakhsh, J., & Deihimfard, R. (2017). Assessing energy efficiencies, economy, and global warming potential (GWP) effects of major crop production systems in Iran: a case study in East Azerbaijan province. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(20), 16971-16984.‏
Nair, R., Schreinemachers, P., 2020. Global Status and Economic Importance of Mungbean. In: Nair, R., Schafleitner, R., Lee, S.H. (Eds.), The Mungbean Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham.
Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H., and Fert, C. (2004) Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29, 39-51.
Payandeh, Z., Kheiralipour, K., Karimi, M. (2016) Evaluation of energy efficiency of broiler production farms using data envelopment analysis technique, case study: Isfahan Province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 47(3), 577-585. (In Persian).
Payandeh, Z., Kheiralipour, K., Karimi, M. Khoshnevisan, B. (2017) Joint data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment for environmental impact reduction in broiler production systems. Energy. 127, 768-774.
Pourmehdi, K., Kheiralipour, K. 2024. Net energy gain efficiency, a new indicator to analyze energy systems, case study: Comparing wheat production systems. Results in Engineering, 22, 102211.
Pourmehdi, K., Kheiralipour, K. 2020. Assessing the effects of wheat flour production on the environment. Advances in Environmental Technology. 2: 111-117.
PRé 2006. PRé Consultants. SimaPro Database Manual.
Ramedani, Z., Alimohammadian, L., Kheialipour, K., Delpisheh, P., Abbasi, Z. 2019. Comparing energy state and environmental impacts in ostrich and chicken production systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27: 28284-28293.
Ramedani, Z., Veisi, A., Lotfi, M., Kheialipour, K., 2024. Comparison of material and energy indicators in sunflower and pumpkin seed production systems. Sustainability Research, Technology Development and Assessment. Doi.10.22098/sr.2024.14811.1020.
Singh, H., Mishra, D., Nahar, N.M. (2002) Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in Arid Zone India Part I. Energy Convers Manage, 43(16), 2275-86.
Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E., Haberl, H., Harper, R., House, J., and Jafari, M. 2014. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(3-4), 247-266.‏
Yousefi, M., Khoramivafa, M., Mondani, F., 2014a. Integrated evaluation of Energy use, ‎‎Greenhouse gas emissions and Global warming ‎potential for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) ‎‎agroecosystems in Iran‎. Atmos. Environ. 92, 501-505.
Yousefi, M., Mahdavi Damghani, A., Khoramivafa, M., 2014b. Energy consumption, greenhouse ‎gas ‎emissions and assessment of sustainability index in corn agroecosystems of Iran. Sci ‎ ‎Total Environ.493, 330-335.
Zhang, D., Shen, J., Zhang, F., Li, Y., Zhang, W. 2017. Carbon footprint of grain production in China. Scientific Reports, 7, 4126.